Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
Social › LGBT Adoption Rights
5>5 Personal answerNo, and adoption agencies should prioritize offering children to straight couples before offering to gay couples |
Social › Abortion
5>5 Personal answerPro-life, but allow in cases of rape, incest, or danger to the mother or child |
Social › Gay Marriage
5>5 Personal answerYes, but allow churches the right to refuse same-sex ceremonies |
the Economy › Equal Pay
5>5 Personal answerYes, and businesses should be required to publish their salary ranges for each position |
Domestic Policy › Gun Control
5>5 Personal answerNo |
Social › Marital Rape
5>5 Personal answerYes |
Healthcare › Drug Price Regulation
5>5 Personal answerThe government cannot be allowed to do this, because they are owned by mega-pharma and their related insurance companies - so they are already the problem. Don't put the wolf in charge of the henhouse. Private oversight and the power to punish these abusive practices is what is needed. |
Social › Gender Identity
5>5 Personal answerNo |
Social › Religious Freedom Act
5>5 Personal answerYes |
Immigration › Muslim Immigrant Ban
5>5 Personal answerYes |
Social › Planned Parenthood Funding
5>5 Personal answerNo |
the Economy › Minimum Wage
5>5 Personal answerIt is an ideal that minimum wage should be very slowly expanded, but this expansion must be tied to each company's profits. It's not the wages, but the interference of government and regulations, such as the federal insurance mandate, that is crippling businesses. |
the Environment › Climate Change
5>5 Personal answerNo |
the Economy › Paid Sick Leave
5>5 Personal answerNo, private businesses should decide the amount of competitive incentives they offer to employees instead of a government mandate |
Domestic Policy › Drug Policy
5>5 Personal answerYes |
Domestic Policy › Term Limits
5>5 Personal answerYes |
Foreign Policy › Mandatory Military Service
5>5 Personal answerYes, but only for those who do not pursue further education or employment |
Domestic Policy › Muslim Surveillance
5>5 Personal answerYes |
Immigration › Immigration
5>5 Personal answerNo, they must formally apply like every other new citizen |
Education › Student Loans
5>5 Personal answerThey should not be dependent upon one another or even related to each other like this. Try not giving free or greatly-reduced tuition to immigrants beyond those of state residents, and stop using affirmative-action type rules to give one color precedence over more qualified students. |
Social › Death Penalty
5>5 Personal answerYes |
Healthcare › Marijuana
5>5 Personal answerYes |
Social › Confederate Flag
5>5 Personal answerYes |
Social › Government Mandates
5>5 Personal answerYes |
Domestic Policy › No-Fly List Gun Control
5>5 Personal answerNo, it is unconstitutional to deny someone’s rights without due process |
Domestic Policy › NSA Domestic Surveillance
5>5 Personal answerNo, only with a warrant showing probable cause of criminal activity |
Domestic Policy › Gerrymandering
5>5 Personal answerYes, gerrymandering gives an unfair advantage to the party in power during redistricting |
Social › Women in Combat
5>5 Personal answerYes, preventing women from serving in combat roles is discriminatory |
Immigration › Illegal Immigrant Detainment
5>5 Personal answerYes |
Science › Mandatory Vaccinations
5>5 Personal answerNo |
Healthcare › Medicaid
5>5 Personal answerYes, but only increase for the elderly and disabled |
Immigration › Border Security
5>5 Personal answerYes |
Social › Gender Workplace Diversity
5>5 Personal answerNo, board members should be the most qualified regardless of gender |
the Environment › Alternative Energy
5>5 Personal answerYes |
Elections › Campaign Finance
5>5 Personal answerYes |
Immigration › Immigration Healthcare
5>5 Personal answerNo |
Immigration › Immigrant Laborers
5>5 Personal answerNo |
Elections › Voter Fraud
5>5 Personal answerYes |
the Economy › Corporate Tax
5>5 Personal answerIncrease for large multinational corporations but lower for small businesses |
Domestic Policy › Patriot Act
5>5 Personal answerIt has been the excuse to enforce the UN Global agenda. 9.11 was an inside job. Create the fear and terror, then work to destroy the country to the point they can call in UN "peacekeepers" who have no affiliation other than to the UN, and would work for their richest elite - not to help us. |
the Economy › Government Spending
5>5 Personal answerYes, and eliminate federal agencies that are unconstitutional |
Foreign Policy › Israel
5>5 Personal answerNo |
Immigration › Immigrant Assimilation
5>5 Personal answerYes |
Domestic Policy › Net Neutrality
5>5 Personal answerNo |
Social › First Amendment
5>5 Personal answerNo, as long as it does not reference a specific religion |
Domestic Policy › Gun Liability
5>5 Personal answerNo |
Social › Niqāb
5>5 Personal answerYes, but their identity must be privately verified by a female staff member |
Crime › Solitary Confinement for Juveniles
5>5 Personal answerNo, but it is currently being overused |
Social › Euthanasia
5>5 Personal answerYes, but only after a psychological examination to show they fully understand this choice |
Immigration › Skilled Immigrants
5>5 Personal answerDecrease, and the government should provide more incentives to prepare our citizens for these jobs |
Domestic Policy › Affirmative Action
5>5 Personal answerNo |
the Economy › Welfare
5>5 Personal answerMore, and deny benefits to immigrants |
the Economy › Labor Unions
5>5 Personal answerHelp, in theory but have recently become corrupt and should have their powers limited |
the Economy › Welfare Drug Testing
5>5 Personal answerI would say no, only if they have a criminal history related to drug abuse, but not convictions for possession of marijuana. |
the Economy › Economic Stimulus
5>5 Personal answerRecession is driven by multinational banks with very close government ties. They lobby and donate and are given positions in government and behind-the-scenes - carte blanche. Eliminate the ability of lobbyists and private corporations to influence our government, and honestly regulate or eliminate multinational banks, |
the Economy › Capital Gains Tax
5>5 Personal answerYes, and increase to the average U.S. tax rate (31.5%) |
Education › Common Core
5>5 Personal answerNo |
Immigration › In-State Tuition
5>5 Personal answerNo |
the Environment › Oil Drilling
5>5 Personal answerNo, and provide more incentives for alternative energy production |
Foreign Policy › United Nations
5>5 Personal answerNo |
Healthcare › Obamacare
5>5 Personal answerNo |
the Environment › Fracking
5>5 Personal answerYes, but increase oversight |
Foreign Policy › Yemen
5>5 Personal answerNo |
Elections › Candidate Transparency
5>5 Personal answerYes |
the Economy › Overtime Pay
5>5 Personal answerNo, and the government is currently over-regulating private businesses |
Foreign Policy › Military Spending
5>5 Personal answerWe can decrease it and improve upon it at the same time if we eliminate the rapacious profits made by "private single-bidder contractors". We can provide better equipment and take care of our service personnel and veterans much better just by eliminating the huge profits of big-lobby war profiteers. |
Science › Nuclear Energy
5>5 Personal answerNo |
Foreign Policy › Torture
5>5 Personal answerI agree with the Geneva Convention rules, but since we have openly abandoned them, I don't see that there has been a great INCREASE in the abuse our own guys receive, which was the argument for adhering to it even in our present precarious self-created situation. So I guess I agree that we need to use the enhanced interrogation techniques in some instances but there needs to be limits. |
Foreign Policy › North Korea Military Strikes
5>5 Personal answerI can't get the real facts. It's been made pretty clear that North Korea hate the US and all or most of the world in general, and they keep themselves very isolated from it. The U.S. should not do this alone or bear an undue proportion of any expenditure for this. In instances like THIS, the UN, being the only thing we have apparently, should step in. The lack of our intelligence agencies to provide information that will not be filtered through a political agenda is a big issue. |
Foreign Policy › ISIS Ground Troops
5>5 Personal answerOnly if we can stop "accidentally" bombing anti-ISIS allies. Not just recently, but several times in memory, we have been strangely unable to hit the "right" targets. I don't believe this is the fault of the individual military people, it comes down from above. We need to uncover what has really been going on. We need to listen to our military men and women, not their superiors, to find out what is really happening. |
Foreign Policy › Foreign Aid
5>5 Personal answerDecrease |
Foreign Policy › Drones
5>5 Personal answerNo, only to gather intelligence, not to kill suspected terrorists |
Science › GMO Labels
5>5 Personal answerYes |
Domestic Policy › Social Security
5>5 Personal answerNo |
the Economy › Estate Tax
5>5 Personal answerYes, and we should eliminate it |
Foreign Policy › Terrorism
5>5 Personal answer"terrorism" is in the eye of the beholder. What our government deems "terrorist" is often what opposes their views, and we switch allegiances back and forth, which is what has CREATED this mess. |
Foreign Policy › NATO
5>5 Personal answerNo |
Foreign Policy › War on ISIS
5>5 Personal answerISIS is not what people think it is. Pretty hard to declare war on the CIA, Israel, and the global elitist war machine that profits from financing all sides of each war. I am a Trump supporter but I do not hear the real truth coming from that quarter because it is too controversial and people still think Iran attacked us on 9/11. Wrong country, but we had to attack them anyway. Not just oil - they were denying the authority of multinational banks'. That is why we rushed to war - it had nothing to do with human rights, obviously. Look who Hillary's allies are! |
Science › Space Exploration
5>5 Personal answerNo, not until we drastically decrease our federal deficit |
Foreign Policy › Ukraine
5>5 Personal answerNo |
the Economy › Offshore Banking
5>5 Personal answerYes, as long as offshore income is reported |
the Economy › Federal Reserve
5>5 Personal answerYes, but I would prefer to abolish it and return to the gold standard |
Foreign Policy › NSA Surveillance
5>5 Personal answerNo |
the Economy › Farm Subsidies
5>5 Personal answerYes, but only small local farms instead of large corporations |
Foreign Policy › Cuba
5>5 Personal answerHow does Cuba stand to benefit from this? We can't say we are not going to deal with them because of their human rights and communism, since we are encourage trade and influence-trading with China and Islamic countries. I would say lift the travel embargo but that will just allow more immigrants to deplete our resources. So my considered answer is NO |
Foreign Policy › Russian Airstrikes in Syria
5>5 Personal answerNo |
the Economy › Property Taxes
5>5 Personal answerTaxes are too high already - both the sales taxes and property taxes. What we need is better decision-makers. |
the Economy › Pension Reform
5>5 Personal answerYes, pension spending is out of control and must be reduced |
the Economy › Government Pensions
5>5 Personal answerNo |
the Economy › Bitcoin
5>5 Personal answerYes |
the Economy › Trans-Pacific Partnership
5>5 Personal answerNo |
the Economy › Online Sales Tax
5>5 Personal answerNo, the federal government does not have the authority to impose state and local taxes |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
You side slightly towards “security”, meaning you more often believe the government should do everything within its power to ensure the security of its citizens. This theme is most important to you.
You are a centrist on left wing and right wing issues. This theme is more important to you.
You are a centrist on authoritarian and libertarian issues. This theme is more important to you.
You are a centrist on democratic socialism and capitalism issues. This theme is more important to you.
You side slightly towards “nationalism”, meaning you more often support policies that prioritize the interests of our nation above others. This theme is more important to you.
You are a centrist on politically incorrect and politically correct issues. This theme is more important to you.
You are a centrist on unilateralism and multilateralism issues. This theme is more important to you.
You side slightly towards “religious”, meaning you more often support policies that reflect religious values and principles. This theme is more important to you.
You side moderately towards “protectionism”, meaning you believe globalization is detrimental to the safety, compensation, environment, and standard of living of workers. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You side slightly towards “deregulation”, meaning you more often believe that government regulation stifles innovation and economic prosperity. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on assimilation and multiculturalism issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on pacifism and militarism issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on traditional and progressive issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on isolationism and imperialism issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on individualism and collectivism issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You side slightly towards “decentralization”, meaning you more often believe that administrative power and decision making should be handled at the local level and serve the best interests of the local community. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on tender and tough issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on small government and big government issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on keynesian and laissez-faire issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on anthropocentrism and environmentalism issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on meritocracy and democracy issues. This theme is only less important to you.
Based on 15 questions that are ranked more important to you.
Based on 4 questions that are ranked more important to you.
Based on 9 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 12 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 17 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 4 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 4 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 21 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
I understand that submitting my email address allows iSideWith.com to send me important notifications via email. Read our privacy policy for more information.
© 2024 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.