+

Answer Overview

Response rates from 16.9k America voters.

46%
Yes
54%
No
46%
Yes
54%
No

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 16.9k America voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 16.9k America voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from America voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @9RDKXM8 from California  answered…1yr1Y

No, but the government should still require manual driving in case there is a technology malfunction.

 @9NCVR3Kfrom Virginia  answered…1yr1Y

Yes, or else the cause of accidents will be defended as “technological errors” instead of human negligence.

 @9TRVT2F  from California  answered…1yr1Y

Yes, restrictions are necessary and laws need to be updated to hold companies accountable for faulty autonomous vehicles causing accidents.

 @amayerica#1  from Iowa  answered…1yr1Y

Yes, until we have a clear understanding of what the technology inhibits for us to completely rely on it.

 @9VJZYWB from Maryland  answered…12mos12MO

Yes, but not now. In the future this may become a bigger issue but it’s not something to worry about at the moment.

 @9TQ2NYH from New Jersey  answered…1yr1Y

I see both sides, I agree tech can make things safer but that we should also be careful and intentional with our use of it

 @9TR4434 from California  answered…1yr1Y

Yes and no, because while advanced tech could be very helpful in the cases of disabled drivers, this could lead to tech malfunctions and possible disaster. It might make driving significantly safer though, as some people are bad at driving.

 @B744TCT from California  answered…4 days4D

I think that they should keep the vehicle technology on where it is now. I don't think it's good for humans to just fully rely on their vehicles to take them places and keep them safe, which is whatwill happen if they continue to advance the technology.