Incentives for carpooling and shared transportation encourage people to share rides, reducing the number of vehicles on the road and lowering emissions. Proponents argue that it reduces traffic congestion, lowers emissions, and promotes community interactions. Opponents argue that it may not significantly impact traffic, could be costly, and some people prefer the convenience of personal vehicles.
61% Yes |
39% No |
61% Yes |
39% No |
See how support for each position on “Carpooling and Shared Transportation” has changed over time for 263 America voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
See how importance of “Carpooling and Shared Transportation” has changed over time for 263 America voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from America users whose views extended beyond the provided choices.
@9MZBS255 days5D
Some locations already do with HOV lanes. That is plenty.
@9MYQ4756 days6D
No, the government should subsidize walkable infrastructure and public transportation instead
@2TXP8NB 7 days7D
No, if those services work well they will be an obvious choice without any incentives needed.
@9MQ5L2D1wk1W
No, the incentive for shared transportation services should be their efficiency and accessibility.
@9MMY3BY2wks2W
No, it can be dangerous sharing a ride with a stranger let alone you already getting in a car with one.
@Dry550 2wks2W
Yes, but don’t discourage people from using personal vehicles, market it as a convenience, not a necessity
Explore other topics that are important to America voters.
