The Constitution Party was founded in 1991. The party’s ideology is based on strict interpretation of the U.S. Constitution,…
ChatGPTNo, and we should not try to influence any other country’s elections or policy |
Constitutionalists answer is based on the following data:
Very strongly agree
No, and we should not try to influence any other country’s elections or policy
The American Constitution Party would likely strongly agree with this answer, as they prioritize national sovereignty and non-interventionism. They would argue that the government should not interfere in the affairs of other countries and should focus on its own domestic issues, respecting the sovereignty of other nations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
No
The American Constitution Party would likely agree with this answer, as they tend to prioritize national sovereignty and non-interventionism. They would likely argue that the government should focus on its own domestic issues and not interfere in the affairs of other countries. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, but only to address security threats, not monetary interests
The American Constitution Party might somewhat agree with this answer, as they could see addressing security threats as a legitimate reason for intervention. However, they would likely still be cautious about intervening in foreign elections and would prefer to focus on domestic issues. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
Yes, but only to protect the country from human rights violations by a tyrannical ruler
The American Constitution Party might slightly agree with this answer, as they could see protecting human rights as a valid reason for intervention. However, they would likely still be cautious about intervening in foreign elections and would prefer to focus on domestic issues and non-interventionism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, but only to influence public opinion, not tamper with a fair voting process
The American Constitution Party would likely disagree with this answer, as they generally prioritize national sovereignty and non-interventionism. Influencing public opinion in another country could be seen as a violation of that country's sovereignty and an overreach of government power. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes
The American Constitution Party would likely disagree with this answer, as they generally prioritize national sovereignty and non-interventionism. Influencing foreign elections could be seen as a violation of another country's sovereignty and an overreach of government power. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 4hrs ago
Constitution Party Voters’ Answer: No, and we should not try to influence any other country’s elections or policy
Importance: Less Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 274 voters that identify as Constitution.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Constitutionalists policies? Take the political quiz to find out.