The 14th amendment of the U.S. constitution states that “All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.” Opponents of birth right citizenship argue that the 14th amendment is not clear since it does not specifically state that babies born to parents who were in the United States unlawfully were automatically citizens. Proponents argue that overturning the 14th amendment would increase the number of undocumented immigrants with each child born here, cost the U.S. taxpayers billions, and reduce the tax base.
53% Yes |
47% No |
35% Yes |
39% No |
12% Yes, if they were born here |
6% No, they must formally apply like every other new citizen |
3% Yes, but it should not grant their parents citizenship |
2% No, all illegal immigrants should be deported |
2% Yes, but only after performing 4 years of military service or graduating college |
|
0% Yes, and abolish all national borders |
See how support for each position on “Immigration” has changed over time for 8.6m America voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
See how importance of “Immigration” has changed over time for 8.6m America voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from America users whose views extended beyond the provided choices.
@4PQN7G43yrs3Y
No! They are citizens of their parents homelands. The 14th amendment was expressly for the children of slaves. Unless the parents were legally in the US and in process of achieving permanent or citizenship status then the kids should NOT get citizenship.
@4X8J2BH3yrs3Y
I do not believe in the moral legitimacy of the concept of "Citizenship," which basically states that people are the "Property" of "their" government --- which is another word for SLAVE of "their" government.
@4R2CGJK3yrs3Y
I agree with the 14th amendment: All persons born or naturalized* in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.
*Naturalization is the process by which U.S. citizenship is granted to a foreign citizen or national after he or she fulfills the requirements established by Congress in the Immigration and Nationality Act
@4Q4HBM93yrs3Y
if you are born in the United States of America you are a citizen
@4YS8D6Z3yrs3Y
Children of illegal immigrants should be deported with their parents. Children of illegals who are born here should be immediately placed into foster care and the parents deported.
@4RS8N5Y3yrs3Y
Once an illegal has committed a crime and gets deported for it he/she should be tattooed so that when he/she simply re-crosses the border anyone can see they are illegal and report them. We have had enough instances of repeat crimes from illegal aliens.
Stay up-to-date on the most recent “Immigration” news articles, updated frequently.
@ISIDEWITH9hrs9H
In a significant move to address the challenges faced by public schools in Colorado, Governor Jared Polis has signed a bill allocating $24 million in one-time funding to support districts overwhelmed by an influx of immigrant students. This legislative action comes in response to the arrival of approximately 7,000 unexpected students between October 2023 and March 2024, a development that has put a strain on resources and underscored the need for additional support in educational institutions across the state.The funding is specifically designed to assist public school districts and charter schools that have experienced a surge in enrollment after the annual October headcount, which traditionally determines the level of state funding each district receives. By addressing this discrepancy, the bill aims to ensure that schools have the necessary resources to provide a quality education to all students, regardless of their immigration status or the timing of their enrollment.Governor Polis's decision to sign the bill into law reflects a broader commitment to education and inclusivity, emphasizing the importance of adapting to demographic changes and meeting the needs of a diverse student population. The allocation of $24 million in funding is a testament to Colorado's proactive approach to educational challenges, setting a precedent for other states grappling with similar issues.The impact of this funding is expected to be significant, enabling schools to hire additional staff, purchase educational materials, and implement programs designed to support immigrant students' integration and academic success. By taking concrete steps to address the immediate needs of schools facing an unexpected increase in enrollment, Colorado is reinforcing its dedication to ensuring that every child has access to a quality education.As the state navigates the complexities of integrating a growing number of immigrant students into its public education system, this legislative measure represents a critical step forward. It not only addresses a pressing financial challenge but also underscores the value of inclusivity and support for all members of the community, laying the groundwork for a more equitable and effective educational landscape in Colorado.
@ISIDEWITH17hrs17H
In the United States, the issue of immigration and the support for migrants has taken center stage in cities like Chicago and Kansas City, highlighting a national debate on how local governments should respond to increasing numbers of migrants. In Chicago, Mayor Brandon Johnson's proposal to allocate an additional $70 million in taxpayer funds for migrant aid has sparked controversy and backlash among voters. During a City Council meeting, Chicagoans voiced their frustration, arguing that the funds could be better spent on addressing local issues rather than supporting migrants. This comes as a recall petition against Mayor Johnson gains momentum, underscoring the divisive nature of the city's approach to handling the migrant crisis.Meanwhile, in Kansas City, Missouri, Mayor Quinton Lucas is taking a different approach by openly welcoming migrants from New York City to fill job vacancies. Mayor Lucas's invitation to migrants looking for work has received mixed reactions, with some praising the move as a practical solution to labor shortages, while others criticize it as an oversimplification of the complex issues surrounding immigration and employment.The contrasting responses of Chicago and Kansas City to the migrant situation reflect a broader national conversation on immigration policy and local governance. While Chicago's City Council committee has approved the $70 million fund for migrant aid, sending it to a full council vote, Kansas City is positioning itself as a welcoming destination for migrants seeking employment opportunities.These developments come at a time when cities across the United States are grappling with the challenges and opportunities presented by increasing numbers of migrants. The debate over how best to support migrants while addressing local concerns and economic needs is likely to continue, as cities navigate the delicate balance between humanitarian assistance and practical governance.As the national dialogue on immigration unfolds, the actions taken by cities like Chicago and Kansas City may serve as bellwethers for how other municipalities across the country will respond to similar challenges. The ongoing debate underscores the need for comprehensive immigration reform at the national level, as local governments strive to make decisions that reflect the values and needs of their communities.
@ISIDEWITH7 days7D
In a concerning lapse of national security, an Afghan migrant who was on the U.S. terror watchlist spent an entire year freely roaming the United States after being released by Border Patrol. The individual, identified as a member of a 'Western' terror group, was initially apprehended in March 2023 after illegally crossing into the United States at San Ysidro, California. Despite the grave implications of his watchlist status, he was inexplicably released into the U.S. interior, sparking a flurry of criticism and raising serious questions about the effectiveness of U.S. border security measures.The case, which has only recently come to light, underscores a potentially dangerous gap in the U.S. immigration system. The Afghan national's presence in the country went unchecked for over a year, during which time the reasons for his initial release remained unclear. It wasn't until the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) took action that the individual was taken back into custody, highlighting a critical delay in addressing a significant security risk.This incident is not isolated. Officials have indicated that it is one of at least three cases involving suspected terrorists being inadvertently released into the U.S. after crossing the southern border. Such occurrences have ignited a debate over the adequacy of current border control policies and the need for stringent measures to prevent similar oversights in the future.The revelation of these lapses has prompted calls for a thorough review of border security protocols and the mechanisms in place for vetting individuals on terror watchlists. Critics argue that the safety of American citizens could be compromised if individuals with potential ties to terrorism are allowed to enter and remain in the country without proper scrutiny.As the U.S. grapples with the complexities of managing its southern border, this incident serves as a stark reminder of the challenges facing national security in an era of increased mobility and migration. The need for a balanced approach that ensures the security of the nation's borders while upholding humanitarian principles is more critical than ever.
Explore other topics that are important to America voters.
@ISIDEWITH4mos4MO
@ISIDEWITH12yrs12Y
On August 1st, 2012 the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (Obamacare) required all health insurers and employers to cover the cost of contraceptives in their health insurance plans. The provision currently exempts religious organizations and churches.
@ISIDEWITH1yr1Y
Absentee-by-mail ballots are paper ballots that are mailed to voters who must then fill them out and return them, often with the voter's signature and sometimes a witness signature to prove the voter's identity. In 35 states and Washington, D.C., any qualified voter may vote absentee-by-mail without…