This policy, often referred to as "Remain in Mexico," requires asylum seekers to stay in Mexico while U.S. immigration courts review their claims. It aims to manage the flow of asylum cases and reduce pressure on U.S. facilities. Proponents argue that it prevents overcrowding in U.S. detention centers, deters frivolous claims, and ensures an orderly asylum process. Opponents argue that it places vulnerable individuals in dangerous conditions, denies them adequate legal support, and violates international asylum protections.
Statistics are shown for this demographic
Voting for candidate
County
City
Response rates from 232 North Carolina voters.
57% Yes |
43% No |
57% Yes |
43% No |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 232 North Carolina voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 232 North Carolina voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from North Carolina voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@B2KL8LV8mos8MO
It depends on the case, but most of the time people who are fleeing from Mexico should be given a safe place to reside.
@B46VKHT6mos6MO
This presumed a racial profile claiming that asylum seekers are only regard to Mexico rather than the whole support status. I think in general they should wait status for approval in the current country they are in depending on the circumstances like a dictorial government like a corruption of power like Haiti, North Korea and others alike. If requiring the fleeing from one home country to find another of peace and livilyhood. It should be understood that proper measures are put in place but also audited to all accounts like a Government agency meaning to be audited as well.
@B3ZX2P26mos6MO
No, but they should not be allowed to leave the sanctuary city they are in until they have obtained citizenship.
@B5DHVJP4mos4MO
No, establishing a deal with Mexico where we can have a cross border area that both nations can ensure the human rights of the asylum seekers as their cases are processed.
@B2KPKM38mos8MO
they should be required to stay wherever they are from while their case is being processed not to tarnish a relationship with Mexico.
@B2KC7T8 8mos8MO
In the end a hard yes or no is hard for me to say. People only escape like that if they are scared, but I think that they should also understand that going over illegally is against the law and should be prepared to be deterred.
@B6XF7TS5 days5D
Yes, if doing so doesn't endanger the lives and dignity of asylum seekers. Humanitarian aid should be required.
@B6WJ99H7 days7D
No, unless humanitarian protections and legal access are fully ensured; otherwise, the policy poses unacceptable risks.
Join in on the most popular conversations.
