+

Toggle voterbase

Statistics are shown for this demographic

Answer Overview

Response rates from 144 State Senate District 8 voters.

78%
Yes
22%
No
78%
Yes
22%
No

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 144 State Senate District 8 voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 144 State Senate District 8 voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from State Senate District 8 voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

  @Sablevarg from Missouri  answered…1yr1Y

Yes, but these should be carefully vetted to limit potential negative effects and used in conjunction with an green energy - not a replacement for green energy.

 @9MJTP4Gfrom Guam  answered…1yr1Y

Yes, but with caution and careful consideration of potential risks and benefits.

 @8K92DLG  from Florida  answered…1yr1Y

Yes, but major research and tests need to be conducted to affirm that we are moving in the right direction, and not furthering our current climate change concerns.

  @ChaseOliverLibertarian  from South Carolina  answered…1yr1Y

The best way to combat climate change is by reducing taxes and artificial barriers to entry so that incentives for innovation allow the market to provide solutions,

 @9V7DV4B from Washington  answered…12mos12MO

We should research it but it needs to be heavily careful and experimental to see if it is even safe for our climate

 @B5X329R from California  answered…3mos3MO

no focus on lowering greenhouse gas emissions as there can be unintended consequences with geoengineering

 @9ZKPQXZ from Kansas  answered…10mos10MO

Not yet. Instead, fund the research to see the other unintended consequences to the environment that they could pose. If the downsides are little-to-none, then pursue it further.

 @9L4Z23B  from Pennsylvania  answered…1yr1Y

Yes, the Department of Interior should engage in P3's to research geoengineering and other ways to combat climate change