Try the political quiz
+

Sort by

Filters

Discussions tagged as:

Choose more filters:

Options

 @9MBVPJX from New York answered…2mins2m

homeless should be aloud on public grounds comftorbly but I think a true person who craves a better life should strive t…

 @9MBSYRV from California answered…2hrs2H

Add a right to housing in the constitution, create a cap on how many for profit-properties a single entity can own, and…

 @9MBRCJR from Texas answered…3hrs3H

Yes up to a certain point so where its not crowded and the area around these buildings are still accessible

 @9MBR3ZV from Louisiana answered…3hrs3H

I feel like it depends on the place. If it's an area with a low-population, large apartments and complexes like that wou…

 @9MBR3DV from New Mexico answered…3hrs3H

They need to give them a place to stay no matter if they say no or not because them laying around can be dangerous for t…

 @9MBQPDY from Pennsylvania answered…3hrs3H

Although homeless and wanting a place to stay, if one has already refused the accommodations given by the programs it is…

 @9MBQLRK from South Dakota answered…3hrs3H

I think that depending on the reasoning as to why the homeless individual refused available shelter or housing needs to…

 @9MBQCT7 from Texas answered…3hrs3H

Yes, but at a lower price for rent or mortgage due to the less space provided and still leave space for neighbourhoods

 @9MBQ8KX from Oklahoma answered…4hrs4H

I think they should be helped with food,clothing,and medicine weather or not they want to be in a shelter because they a…

 @9MBPZJX from Texas answered…4hrs4H

There should be more affordable housing in densely populated areas instead of luxury lofts, these luxury lofts will crea…

 @9MBPHY6 from Louisiana answered…4hrs4H

Yes, though it should be less extravagant and more affordable housing which can be used for both government housing as w…

 @9MBPBVY from Louisiana answered…4hrs4H

They should not be refusing public housing in the first place. If the government has already tried to help and they refu…

 @9MBNQL8 from Pennsylvania answered…4hrs4H

Individuals should have options for shelter and food because they are basic necessities that must be met for survival

 @9MBN6QY from Ohio answered…5hrs5H

yes, but there should be certain area where they can stay without disturbing the rest of the public and not be in the wa…

 @9MBMRHP from Florida answered…5hrs5H

I think that they should let homeless people on public property but if they are causing trouble they should evicted

 @9MBG9QX from Washington answered…7hrs7H

No, but provide legitimate individual housing for those who need it. And offer free mental health services to them so th…

 @9MBFYCQ from New York answered…8hrs8H

No, but find better alternatives other than throwing them in jail. Find out why they might refuse housing and make homel…

 @9MBF553 from Louisiana answered…8hrs8H

YES, the government etc can build all these new buildings etc but cant make a way to make a difference with the high lev…

 @9MBBM3H from Pennsylvania answered…9hrs9H

We should turn already existing abandoned buildings into homes for the homeless instead of tearing them down

 @9MB8CT5 from Wyoming answered…11hrs11H

yes but not every public property. designate areas where public camping would be allowed as well as providing proper bat…

 @9MB7CRL from Texas answered…13hrs13H

Yes, only if it is ensured that the buildings will be responsibly managed and not be owned by corporate landlords

 @2YWMS7X answered…17hrs17H

Yes, and deploy all of the various strategies for harnessing development to public benefit in a uniform and transparent…

 @9MB332M from New Mexico answered…19hrs19H

it honestly depends on the shelters or housing available, Because sometimes living on the streets is better for some peo…

 @9MB2MTP from Indiana answered…20hrs20H

I think it depends on the area. You don't want it over-crowded. Also, doing that could raise property taxes. I think ran…