Try the political quiz
+

Sort by

Filters

Discussions tagged as:

Choose more filters:

Options

 @9MNF3R3 from New York answered…3mins3m

No, they should be in low rent housing or shelters if unable to work due to mental health conditions. They should not be…

 @9MNF3R3 from New York answered…3mins3m

They should raise the taxes on forgein property investors for exporting the goods back to their country and pay at least…

 @9MNDNTD from Oregon answered…32mins32m

There should be designated public spaces that allow encampments. Not all spaces should be available but there need to be…

 @9MNDH7D from Michigan answered…43mins43m

That should be up to the free market and the government shouldn't be involved

 @9MNCDGD from Massachusetts answered…2hrs2H

Yes and establish UBI to help maintain rent control

 @9MN9G2Y from California answered…4hrs4H

I don't have enough information to give a direct answer

 @9MN6C94 from Texas answered…6hrs6H

Yes, but only if they are trying to get a job or already have one

 @9MN3HZG from California answered…6hrs6H

No, funding should try to address the causes of homelessness. Priority should be on creating equal opportunities for hom…

 @9MN587F from Wisconsin answered…7hrs7H

in places like New York and California yes because they have very high population but in places like Montana where popul…

 @9MN4X2K from California answered…7hrs7H

No, but but fund more public shelters and low income or free housing, such as tiny homes for those who need to get back…

 @9MN3DDP from Connecticut answered…8hrs8H

Goverment should reduce regulatory burden on builders to reduce cost of housing.

 @Fearless261from Georgia  answered…8hrs8H

Yes - But only if there is more than 3 years of timely payments on record.

 @9MN37YC from Virginia answered…8hrs8H

I would say yes and no, i believe that there should be grounds for homeless people in parts of not accepting shelter, bu…

 @9MMY8QC from Ohio answered…9hrs9H

Yes, they should be allowed to camp on public property, but only from certain hours and only for so many days. No long t…

 @9MMVN85 from Minnesota answered…11hrs11H

We need more apartments because the population is growing quickly, but houses are very important, for families and not e…

 @9MMVMKS from Texas answered…11hrs11H

Dependence on worth of house and the persons income. If its where someone cant afford a basic house then yes, but if som…

 @9MMTXQY from Wisconsin answered…11hrs11H

I believe yes but only in certain areas. For example, they could scare kids if they sleep at a playground.

 @9MMTS58 from Indiana answered…11hrs11H

If the first time buyer meets minimum requirements

 @9MMS87Z from Hawaii answered…12hrs12H

There should be alotted places for them to camp and can continue living in which they currently wish (assuming they do n…

 @9MMRX8D from Virginia answered…12hrs12H

I think the answer would be no for me, because these buildings would take up more space that could have been used to pla…

 @9MMRWGV from Minnesota answered…12hrs12H

No, instead take homes that have been on the market for awhile and make them more affordable

 @9MMJGLG from North Carolina answered…22hrs22H

yes but give them specific areas to sleep at bc they cant be at every public area bc some homeless people be doing thing…

 @9MMHXMM from California answered…22hrs22H

No, but I think if we invested more in better temporary housing, food, and better public healthcare - it would really de…

 @9MMHKYX from Washington answered…23hrs23H

No, but provide more free shelters for the homeless and social programs to get people back on their feet.