Try the political quiz
+

Sort by

Filters

Discussions tagged as:

Choose more filters:

Options

 @9MNFRVY from Texas answered…32mins32m

Yes as long as it goes through rigorous trials and testing

 @9MNDJ4S from Missouri answered…2hrs2H

Yes, but only if the disease is proven to be deadly and the vaccine actually works. No more Covid like BS.

 @9MNDH7D from Michigan answered…2hrs2H

The state shouldn't be allowed to make medical decisions for people, it should be a personal decision. If we keep this u…

 @9MN7DQS from Florida answered…5hrs5H

There need to be strict regulations on harmful ingredients not for human consumption

 @9MN8PN3 from Georgia answered…5hrs5H

So long as laboratories can prove that lab-grown meat is perfectly safe for human consumption with little to no long ter…

 @9MN7LXS from Georgia answered…6hrs6H

Nuclear power plants can be safe, buy only if they are very carefully built and very closely monitored. No burying nucle…

  @Deep_Fried_Milk from Oregon answered…7hrs7H

As long as it is a viable and cost-effective method of obtaining meat and as long as it is advertised as lab grown.

 @9MN24YZ from Georgia answered…10hrs10H

Getting vaccinated should be optional because not every parent wants their child to get vaccinated, some vaccinations br…

 @9MN22WH from New Jersey answered…10hrs10H

Yes, but it has to be clearly stated on the packaging and there has to be published researched

 @9MMZWFR from North Carolina answered…10hrs10H

no because that can make us sick and our odys can change

 @9MMZ7PD from Minnesota answered…10hrs10H

It depends on how the meat was made. If the meat is safe to eat then they can regulate it.

 @9MMY8BQ from Oregon answered…11hrs11H

Yes. This sounds like humans trying to play God. Kind of like Frankenstein.

 @9MMY3YN from North Carolina answered…11hrs11H

If the person has a diseases like sickle-cell anemia then yes, but if it just for personal gain then no.

 @9MMY3BY from Arkansas answered…11hrs11H

No, but if it's important or dangerous, have exceptions for plausible reasons. Religious, maybe certain allergens, etc.

 @9MMY27H from California answered…11hrs11H

Yes, I believe it’s important for Darwinism to happen and for natural selection to happen

 @9MMXP2D from Pennsylvania answered…11hrs11H

CRISPR shouldn’t even be a thing. The government should regulate it to where it doesn’t get out of control.

 @9MMWPQ8 from Michigan answered…11hrs11H

If it is used within safe and ethical boundaries then I think it is ok to proceed.

 @9MMW4Z8 from Michigan answered…12hrs12H

Depending on the exact modifications it is being used for

 @9K99V29 from Florida answered…13hrs13H

Yes, but not without strict regulation and research

 @9MMRW4T from North Carolina answered…14hrs14H

Wait to see what the long-term health effects are.

 @9MMRPXL from North Carolina answered…14hrs14H

I think an increase would be beneficial but I also believe that money could be used to find more out about our planet, l…

 @9MMQPLY from Indiana answered…14hrs14H

Regardless, things like food shouldn’t be commodities to be commercialized in the first place

 @9MMQ8BG from Massachusetts answered…15hrs15H

There should be no genetic modifications to human DNA