Try the political quiz
+

Sort by

Filters

Discussions tagged as:

Choose more filters:

Options

 @9NFZ4WQ from Georgia answered…29mins29m

Yes, but not by demonizing anyone who is mentally ill, and not in such a way that would make it more expensive (and ther…

 @9NFX24Q from North Carolina answered…2hrs2H

No, and all current regulation should be removed. Shall not be infringed means shall not be infringed.

 @9NFWMY4 from Washington answered…3hrs3H

Yes, however the teacher should be subject to psychological testing and other tests monthly. Along with the guns being s…

 @9NFW5SC from Washington answered…3hrs3H

Yes, if we continue to fund and operate public schools, then teachers should be allowed but not required to carry, and p…

 @9NFVQ2Y from Texas answered…3hrs3H

I think anyone should legally be aloud to buy them I just don't think they should be as accessible and you should take a…

 @9NFRHSP from New York answered…5hrs5H

Yes, but only to include mandatory background checks and closing private sales and gun show loopholes

 @9NFP8TR from Virginia answered…6hrs6H

I believe that, while background checks are reasonable for preventing major gun-related crimes, states should handle gun…

 @9NFJTN5 from Ohio answered…8hrs8H

Yes, and create a standardized process for redistricting that a computer can calculate and generate a map without politi…

 @9NFGRXK from North Carolina answered…9hrs9H

Yes, but they must meet very specific requirements and they can only carry if there aren't school resource officers or s…

 @9NFG6YX from Connecticut answered…9hrs9H

I don't have a strong position on this issue. Exposing the surveillance was the right thing to do, but going to Russia w…

 @9NFG6YX from Connecticut answered…9hrs9H

No, as long as they are following all laws and regulations, and they are marketing their firearms for defensive and spor…

 @9NFFLMZ from Texas answered…10hrs10H

Yes, as long as it's optional and they pass a risk assessment to ensure it will be used responsibly.

 @9NFFLMZ from Texas answered…10hrs10H

Keep current restrictions and audit them for any loopholes, improvements needing to be made and ensure enforcement agenc…

 @9NFB3DW from New York answered…11hrs11H

No, hire veterans who have been honorably discharged have been medically cleared to provide security services.

 @9NF9B4M from Iowa answered…12hrs12H

ISPs should be allowed to allocate infrastructure in whatever way they please, provided that all websites are given a mi…

 @9NF9B4M from Iowa answered…12hrs12H

No, but political advertising by election campaigns should be limited to a short duration before an election and Citizen…

 @9NF9B4M from Iowa answered…12hrs12H

No, but the government should regulate social media as a means to protect free speech; social media websites should not…

 @9NF9B4M from Iowa answered…12hrs12H

No, but I do not respect anyone who does so and it should be illegal to burn our flag on public property

 @9NF9B4M from Iowa answered…12hrs12H

Yes, but drug addicts who become a public nuisance should be involuntarily sent to rehab (or sent to jail as a normal cr…

 @9NF9B4M from Iowa answered…12hrs12H

Yes, but only reform to impose an 18-year, single-term limit on judges and space out terms so that an old justice retire…

 @9NF5V4X from Kansas answered…13hrs13H

Private companies should be able to restrict any content they wish, as long as they inform their users.

 @9NDNZ2X from Massachusetts answered…22hrs22H

Free speech is essential. Speech needs to be regulated only when violent or inherently destructive. Anti US ideals is ex…