Nothing someone else does can compel them to let someone who isn't their friend in the club.
It is a logically coherent libertarian position. Where it breaks down is at scale.
"Segregation" generally refers to scale, public property, civil society, etc. Also, to refer to the South again, when one group has a near total monopoly on "private property", they can create de-facto segregation, which gets in to the inherent coercive nature of "Libertarians"/
Small scale examples of segregation exist all over right now. Go to any university campus and you can find [ethnic minority] club and such. Capitalism, at least as intended, is primarily incentive based as opposed to coercion-based. There is no system that is free from force.
You say that about Capitalism but history shows otherwise. In the South, one group owns almost all the property because of a systematic campaign of murder, kidnapping, and genocide. All "private property" everywhere has similar history, just usually further back in time.
Yeah, it's a crappy system except for all the others.
@Freedom762wks2W
The only crappy things that have happened under capitalism were because the society was insufficiently capitalist.
@Freedom762wks2W
Ah, so you’re one of those “libertarians” who doesn’t know a thing about libertarianism. I’ll try to dumb it down to your level, but unfortunately I don’t have any crayons. But here goes nothing…
True libertarians believe that there are three God-given natural rights — life, liberty, property — and that these rights can come into conflict. Life — the right not to be killed — is the most important, because if you’re dead, you can enjoy neither liberty nor property. Liberty — the right not to be enslaved — comes… Read more
