Try the political quiz

25 Replies

  @Patriot-#1776Constitution from Washington commented…2mos2MO

Worthless, degenerate scumbags who murder people, in attacking the right of life of others, have renounced their own, and thus deserve the full punishment of the law.

  @9CJ6CB6 from Virginia commented…2mos2MO

Functionally speaking, it’s not a great idea. Morally, it’s a grey area, but I’d let those criminals stay in prison, a lower quality prison, sure, but someone murdering someone else does not excuse us committing it in turn. An eye for an eye just makes the whole world blind, and it does nothing for justice, the sanctity of life, or for the families of those murdered themselves. The best way to deal with crime is to increase the certainty of punishment, not the severity. If everyone knew they’d get caught, and be sentenced to prison, then doing the crime sounds a lot…  Read more

  @Patriot-#1776Constitution from Washington commented…2mos2MO

This whole notion that you can't prevent crime by severely punishing it is stupid. In fact, the more severe the punishment, the less of that crime you'll have. Death Penalty is ultimate punishment.

  @9CJ6CB6 from Virginia commented…2mos2MO

Death penalty is an attempt of a deterrent, and a rather weak one at that. Of the few countries where it works, Singapore is the main example, a nation that has sacrificed much of its liberties and rights to lower crime using harsh capital punishment. At the same time, nations like Denmark, Iceland, and Canada have lower crime levels than most others on earth, yet all 3 have no death penalty to speak of. Most nations on earth have rid themselves of it, and their crime rates are fine. You can try to fix it with severe penalties, but you have to expand government power dramatically higher to do so. That’s been the case with Singapore, and remains the case with a lot of countries. Treating the cause of the crime is a FAR better option than punishing the action far worse than usual.

  @Patriot-#1776Constitution from Washington commented…2mos2MO

So you're simultaneously crying out about the alleged injustice of punishing to any worthy degree degenerate murderous scumbags who kill innocent people while at the same time proclaiming as a positive good the industrialised butchery of one million innocent unborn children per year without realising the absurd contradiction? For me, it's quite the opposite scenario: I want to put to justice the murderous scumbags who kill innocent people while protecting with the full power of the law millions of innocent human beings from massacre. In both instances my goal is to protect innocent…  Read more

About this author

Learn more about the author that submitted this comment.

Last activeActivity1,502 discussionsInfluence1 engagementsEngagement bias100%Audience bias2%Active inPartyUndeclaredLocationUnknown