Morality is nothing more than our own personal values and opinions on any given conflict or issue. There is nothing objective about it, that's why we rely on some form of laws to determine what we as a society will or will not allow. Without any kind of mutual agreement on what will or will not be acceptable within society, that is how you end up with some kind of "wild west" every-man-for-himself nonsense, because morality is not objective and people have different morals.
As for your question, I do not have faith in a god for the same reason i do not have faith in elves or unicorns or any other gods or mythos: because there is no evidence to support it, nor reason to believe any exists in the first place. I do not believe in your god for the same reasons that neither of us believe in Zeus or Anubis or Buddhas or etc. If you don't believe in any other gods, then you should understand exactly why other people wouldn't believe in your god as well, for the same exact reasons. They were all made up by people who didn't yet understand how the world worked, and many continue to be believed in because it feels better to some people to believe than having to cope without one.
@Patriot-#1776Constitution4mos4MO
Your argument is fallacious: Morality IS relative means the exact same things as "it is entirely subjective because we made it up. Morality is nothing more than our own personal values and opinion on any given conflict or issue." You were just summing your position up using different words. You've made no argument at all, nor have you answered my question.
And you have said you do not believe in God because God lacks any evidence, but that's again begging the question, you have just restated your position without providing evidence for it. This is all fallacies and circular reasoning cloaked in emotion and deceptive rhetoric.
@VulcanMan6 4mos4MO
What exactly is fallacious about stating that morality is relative? Yes, I said that morality is relative AND i also said that morality is subjective BECAUSE it's the same idea...I was literally just explaining it in more than one way. What exactly is the fallacy here? My statements mean the same thing because that is what my argument is, I simply explained it from multiple different angles: 1) morality is relative, 2) morality is subjective, and 3) morality is made up. They mean the same thing because the argument is the same: morality is not objective. What wasn't clear about that… Read more
Secondly, your claim:
