Which political ideology do you most identify with?
Can true equality exist when individuals are left to accumulate wealth without limits?
You assume that each economic transaction that takes place, namely wage and price setting, must necessarily benefit one side while necessarily harming another. This is absurd, if at least one side was injured in each economic transaction that takes place, no one would trade with one another and no one would be working. Obviously both sides benefit (or at least feel convicted so) which would instead of regressing society, move it forward. Each man would walk away better than he went into it. Multiply that by millions of transactions every single day and you have laissez-faire free market. You must not make blithe assumptions like you have, this falls under the logical fallacy category of presumption. Obviously I am not fallaciously arguing that because you used a fallacy your position is necessarily false, all I am saying is that this particular argument is logically unacceptable and until I hear another LOGICAL one you can consider this issue resolved.
Be the first to reply to this comment.