Try the political quiz

18 Replies

 @9HFN6N3 from South Carolina answered…5mos5MO

Depending on the situation, those who do not work should get at least some of the benefits of those that do work.

 @9HFQKZ8 from Kentucky commented…5mos5MO

If they choose not to work that is on them and they should not get anything special treatment.

 @9HFMWP2 from Texas answered…5mos5MO

No, People who are more willing to work with their community and to make more efficient communities should have help instead of the people who don't help whats so ever.

 @9HCNSNP from Arizona answered…5mos5MO

No, Because the people who do work and contribute the society work hard for that and the ones who do nothing to help shouldn't get anything because they are waste of space that this country doesn't need.

 @9H4QSGS from Kentucky answered…6mos6MO

No if they are disabled then yes but if they don't want to then they are not a useful part of society

 @9H4QRGZ from Pennsylvania answered…6mos6MO

I believe that people who do not work should not have the same benefits to people who can work because they are putting more into the community then the people who don't want to go out and get a job.

 @9HFN7G3 from Georgia answered…5mos5MO

While this is a multifaceted issue, no. People who contribute to society are aiding the economy and helping to fund social programs. The people who do not contribute should not be able to 'leech' off of those who do.

 @9H4QSLPRepublican from Indiana answered…6mos6MO

Absolutely not. People who do not should not be getting the same benefits as someone who is working hard to survive.

 @9HFP2VQ from Florida answered…5mos5MO

The ones who cant work should still receive support and those who don't want to should get less support.

 @9H4QMSMRepublican from Pennsylvania answered…6mos6MO

No, they should not. If they want to be given benefits they must work for them

 @9H4QQ28 from Kentucky answered…6mos6MO

no if you dont want to work then you dont deserve the same as the people who do they deserve way more cause they put in more effort

 @9HCNK56 from Nevada answered…5mos5MO

slow economic growth, less entrepreneurial opportunity and competition, and a potential lack of motivation by individuals due to lesser rewards.

 @9HFNM87from PR answered…5mos5MO

Yes, because our definition of work is archaic and even if they are not able to produce, society and communities should be able to provide them with a dignified life.

 @9H4R69H from North Carolina answered…6mos6MO

Yes, it is our responsibility to create a society that allows all to prosper and live harmoniously. No group of people is able to adequately define what it means to "contribute" to society. It is too subjective.

  @VulcanMan6  from Kansas answered…6mos6MO

All people have intrinsic value as human beings and are deserving of a quality life, yes.

 @9H4QWX8 from New York answered…6mos6MO

People should not receive the same benefits as someone who contributes a ton to society, if they don't contribute to society. People put time, money, and effort into society, it is completely unfair to give someone who does nothing the same benefits.

  @Patriot-#1776Constitution from Washington answered…2mos2MO

No, if they don't want to work, they're not going to eat. These people are adults, time to stop babying them. They must face the consequences of their laziness or repent and turn from it.

  @Patriot-#1776Constitution from Washington answered…5mos5MO

No, They Should Starve to Death If They're Unwilling to Work. Those Who Cannot Work, However, Should Be Supported By Private Charity.

Engagement

The historical activity of users engaging with this question.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...