Try the political quiz

Should victims of gun violence be allowed to sue firearms dealers and manufacturers?

Yes, any business should be held liable if the primary use of its product is for illegal activity

Conversation thread

The following is a 4 message exchange between 3 users

+
Expand
+ Settings

Filter by author

Narrow down the conversation to these participants:

 @9FVGK4N  from South Carolina  agreed…2yrs2Y

A gun's primary purpose is supposedly for hunting according to gun advocates, so if is not being used for that purpose then gun manufacturers should be held liable for their misuse to make sure they have a stake in how their products are being used.

 @9FWJFVP from Washington  disagreed…2yrs2Y

Guns are also essential for self-defense and making criminals fear innocent civilians. Banning such weapons would cause criminals to be emboldened.

 @9FVGK4N  from South Carolina  commented…2yrs2Y

That has been proven to not work. Criminals do not fear locations with guns.

 @9TYJFHK from Illinois  disagreed…12mos12MO

Not one mass shooting has happened in a school with armed teachers.

More conversations

Join in on more popular conversations.