@9FMKJMT7mos7MO
Well, we have found in history that having an alliance of great world powers (at least those posed in the modern era) has always needed the likes of the US to be successful; without the US, it is hard to put into action any sort of repercussions for a nations wrong doing. Therefore, I find it to be of the utmost importance, that the US remains in NATO.
@9GYY6SZ6mos6MO
Don't risk our security over other nations, let them do as they please; defend us, for us, not for them.
@9FDD6YJ8mos8MO
America is like the security of the world we need to be involved in conflicts so countries don't get strong and preventing another world war or any type of wars.
@9F4ZSM38mos8MO
The United States shouldn't continue subsidizing European welfare states of NATO members who do not meet the 2% contribution threshold while we run massive deficits.
Financial contributions or not, NATO becomes more than just financial contributions. It revolves around the defense of allies.
@9M2RNL5Republican13hrs13H
Just because other countries don't increase their financial contributions doesn't mean that NATO is useless and isn't helpful, numbers in countries is more than one country with more wealth and financial contributions. Just the idea of NATO helps to protect us because if it's war with one, then it's war with all, and all is more than a single country. If there were 100 kindergarteners against 1 teacher, the kindergarteners would probably win, given the fact that they would totally overpower the single force and would overwhelm them with tiny hits.
The historical activity of users engaging with this answer.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
